Accounting Review Services in Nashik | N D Savla & Associates
Accounting Review · Nashik, Maharashtra

Accounting Review for In-House Prepared Books — Examined. Corrected. Strengthened.

An independent review of accounts maintained in-house, identifying misstatement, weak controls and reconciliation gaps before the auditor does.

Book Free Consultation

A business with its own accountant does not need someone to redo the books. It needs someone to look at them independently — to check that the balances are real, the classifications are right and nothing has been quietly parked where it will not be noticed.

At N D Savla & Associates, we review in-house accounts for businesses in Nashik and across Maharashtra, either periodically through the year or once before the accounts go to audit.

A review is not an audit and does not carry an audit opinion. It is a diagnostic exercise: we look for the specific things that commonly go wrong — suspense balances, unreconciled control accounts, capital items in revenue, and provisions that were never made.

Our Accounting Review Services

Ledger Scrutiny

Examination of the ledgers for misclassification, duplication and unusual entries.

Reconciliation Review

Verification that bank, vendor, customer and statutory accounts are reconciled.

Control Account Testing

Agreement of subsidiary records with the control accounts in the ledger.

Cut-Off Testing

Checking that income and expenses fall in the correct accounting period.

Statutory Reconciliation

Agreement of turnover and input credits with the GST and TDS filings.

Internal Control Assessment

Assessment of authorisation, segregation and approval in the accounting process.

Correction Support

Preparation of the correcting entries and guidance to the in-house team.

Pre-Audit Review

A focused review before the accounts are handed to the auditor.

Our Review Process

1

Scope Agreement

The period, the areas of focus and the depth of the review are agreed.

2

Data Extraction

Trial balance, ledgers and supporting schedules are obtained for the period.

3

Examination

Balances, reconciliations and classifications are tested against the records.

4

Findings Report

Issues are reported with their effect on the accounts and how to correct them.

5

Correction and Follow-up

Corrections are passed and the process weaknesses behind them are addressed.

Why It Matters

Errors found before the auditor finds them
Suspense and unreconciled balances cleared
Books agreed with the statutory returns
Capital and revenue correctly separated
Control weaknesses identified with fixes
In-house team supported rather than replaced
Shorter and cheaper year-end audit
Management figures that can be relied on

Frequently Asked Questions

A review is a diagnostic examination for the management’s own use and does not result in an audit opinion, while an audit is a formal statutory examination with a reported conclusion.
It is most useful before the accounts go to audit, and periodically through the year where transaction volume is high or the accounting team is small.
Unreconciled control accounts, balances parked in suspense, capital expenditure booked as revenue and missing provisions are the recurring ones.
No — the review supports the in-house team by identifying issues and improving the process, and the team continues to maintain the books.
Yes — agreeing turnover and credits in the books with what was actually reported in the returns is a standard part of the exercise.
It depends on the volume of transactions and the state of the records, and the scope is agreed in advance so the effort is known.

Not sure the books are right?

Give us the trial balance and the ledgers — we’ll tell you what is wrong and how to correct it.